Astronomy has established that the universe is about 13.7 billion years old and arose out of a cosmic singularity. No account of the development of our universe can be harmonized with the creation accounts in Genesis, as the latter are pure folklore. Archaeology has found no evidence of 400 years of Israelite slavery in Egypt, Israelites who wandered in the wilderness for 40 years, or an Israelite conquest of Canaan. Geological evidence in the sedimentary rock layers of a roughly 4.5 billion year old planet confirms the slow evolutionary development of life, just as astronomical evidence confirms the slow evolutionary development of galaxies, stars, and planets. Geology also falsifies that at any point in human history there was a universal flood which covered the Earth.
In the actual book, Loftus went into greater detail discussing various theories that Christians use in attempts to harmonize Genesis with science, and in typical Loftus fashion, his attacks are leveled against the uneducated, ignorant, logically, factually and historically inept Christian. Loftus spends 24 pages attack the Gap theory, concordist interpretation, local creation, YEC and various other theories created in the 1970's, but I am not here to defend either of those theories, I am simply here to prove to Loftus that Genesis can in fact be harmonized with science.
Genesis 1:1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
The word here for create is the word BARA which means to create something new.
1) to create, shape, form
a) (Qal) to shape, fashion, create (always with God as subject)
1) of heaven and earth
2) of individual man
3) of new conditions and circumstances
4) of transformations
b) (Niphal) to be created
1) of heaven and earth
2) of birth
3) of something new
4) of miracles
c) (Piel)
1) to cut down
2) to cut out
2) to be fat
a) (Hiphil) to make yourselves fat
Interpretation: In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth brand new
Now we go down to the 'fourth day' and we see a different word, it is the word MADE.
Genesis 1:14-17
14 And God said, "Let there be lights in the expanse of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years,
15 and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth." And it was so.
16 God made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars.
17 God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.
Look at the word made, it is the word ASAH, and asah means to fashion from pre existing material or an action completed in the past.
1) to do, fashion, accomplish, make
a) (Qal)
1) to do, work, make, produce
a) to do
b) to work
c) to deal (with)
d) to act, act with effect, effect
2) to make
a) to make
b) to produce
c) to prepare
d) to make (an offering)
e) to attend to, put in order
f) to observe, celebrate
g) to acquire (property)
h) to appoint, ordain, institute
i) to bring about
j) to use
k) to spend, pass
b) (Niphal)
1) to be done
2) to be made
3) to be produced
4) to be offered
5) to be observed
6) to be used
c) (Pual) to be made
2) (Piel) to press, squeeze
Interpretation: 16 God had made two great lights—the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also had made the stars.
17 God set them in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning—the fourth day.
"God HAD made 2 great lights, he also HAD made the stars in verse 1 already, the heavens were already created, it said it in verse 1, so God took what he HAD made already and put them there, as you can see it is not the word BARA that is in Genesis 1:16 which means to create as new, it is the word ASAH.
http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexic...54&version=kjv
2. (Niphal) to be created
1. of heaven and earth
2. of birth
3. of something new
4. of miracles
http://www.biblestudytools.net/Lexic...13&version=kjv
17. (Niphal)
1. to be done
2. to be made
3. to be produced
4. to be offered
5. to be observed
6. to be used
18. (Pual) to be made
These are legitimate uses for the words, it states that the stars, sun, the whole heavens(which indicates the universe) is older than the earth. Regarding six literal days? Psa 90:4 states:
For a thousand years in your sight are like a day that has just gone by, or like a watch in the night.
The word day in Genesis is also the word Yowm. A valid interpretation means a general time period.
1) day, time, year
a) day (as opposed to night)
b) day (24 hour period)
1) as defined by evening and morning in Genesis 1
2) as a division of time
a) a working day, a day's journey
c) days, lifetime (pl.)
d) time, period (general)
e) year
f) temporal references
1) today
2) yesterday
3) tomorrow
An old earth and old universe can be interpreted in Genesis 1 just as 'literally' as a young earth can. The above explanation is compatible with the age of the earth, the creation of the universe, stars, sun, earth etc, and since an exact age of things is not presented in the Bible, it can be changed when the available evidence comes into play, and while this post discusses only the astrology aspects of the Genesis, I cannot, in the same confidence I do astrology, present an interpretation for the origins of life since I am presently ignorant, uninterested, and apathetic in evolutionary biology(BORING!). However, I will note that some people ascribe to 'theistic evolution,' so my guess(a guess from an ignorant, uninterested apathetic person that finds the whole concept a huge bore) is it is compatible with Genesis.
4 comments:
TD,
What do you make of the Reasons to Believe Ministry and their take on Old Earth Creationism?
Cheers,
TD,
What do you make of the Reasons to Believe Ministry and their take on Old Earth Creationism?
They're pretty good, I partially based my post off of the research they've done.
Isn't their whole position that the world has progressed, biologically/astronomically/geologically/etc, in the exact same way that 'evolutionists' say it did.... except God was creating each species as it showed up rather that that species emerging from a parent population?
It seems unnecessary really, God could just use the process of evolution as a tool for making mankind, right?
Ooops, sorry, I know you find all that to be a bore!
I'll be honest, I can't really follow the crow-bar logic that it takes to make Genesis fit with an old earth, it just seems far easier to take the Genesis story as just that; a story.
But then, I don't really have the understanding of the language etc, to make an educated position on this.
Cheers,
Isn't their whole position that the world has progressed, biologically/astronomically/geologically/etc, in the exact same way that 'evolutionists' say it did.... except God was creating each species as it showed up rather that that species emerging from a parent population?
I don't know their position regarding that, if memory serves me correct, I think they adhere to some sort of weird hybrid of creation and evolution they're working on.
It seems unnecessary really, God could just use the process of evolution as a tool for making mankind, right?
Sure, no different that how He uses meteorology.
I'll be honest, I can't really follow the crow-bar logic that it takes to make Genesis fit with an old earth, it just seems far easier to take the Genesis story as just that; a story.
Its not crow bar logic, it's just having an understanding of the words and realizing that the popular interpretations that you have heard and grew up with don't always = truth. Its a very simple read, I think, people don't approach it with a critical eye.
But then, I don't really have the understanding of the language etc, to make an educated position on this.
appreciate the honesty, it is quite rare among atheists (in my experience anyway).
Post a Comment