Theological Discourse is a fellow blogger who I initially encountered after making a youtube video on the logical problem of evil, he posted two (comical) videos in response to mine, both of which demonstrated that he clearly wasn't attempting to comprehend the argument. He further posted a blog in August on the problem of evil, in some sort of alleged rebuttal to infidals.org. You can find that post here.
I already responded to these stupid baseless assertion on YT. He just asserts with no evidence whatsoever that I was not attempting to comprehend the argument. These are nothing but baseless assertions.
As you will see Theo's response leaves to little to respond to, mainly because he doesn't actually say much of anything about the problem of evil, save a few meaningless assertions and some bible verses that do not really address the problem of evil.
Now he once again asserts with no evidence that I didn't say anything about the POE, which is clearly incorrect. He then declares that the assertions I made are 'meaningless' and states that some bible verses do not really address the problem, really? why might that be? because Aaron says so? comical ignorance right here, more baseless assertions from a frustrated atheist who can't refute a word I said. Not only that, but those assertions are simply incorrect since the bible verses directly refute his stupid claim that God did not create everything 100% good which can be found from 2:14-5:00 in this video here. Every single stupid assertion he made was refuted.
The main problem lies in that Theo doesn't realize that the problem of evil is not asking if an all powerful, all knowing, all loving and wholly moral being can tolerate evil; it's asking why such a being would create a world with evil if it has the powers (all-omnis) and the moral obligation (wholly good) to do otherwise.
This is Aaron taking my rebuttal to a SPECIFIC ARTICLE and applying it to ALL POE ARGUMENTS. This is also Aaron completely inable to refute a single thing I've said on the video. All he does is give baseless assertions without a shred of evidence to support them.
Theo do your homework a little better next time please.
No, YOU need to do your homework in logic and stop assuming stupid things. My response to a specific argument should not be applied to anything other than that specific article.
Now onto another ignorant statement he made.
If go to that video you will see that 3 other people posted responses and all of them got a response, I actually posted my 5th response video on that subject last night. Maybe if you watch those you will have some of your questions answered.
In other words, he responded to everyone except me. I wonder why that might be? He does not want to respond to my arguments despite me giving a rebuttal to EVERY SINGLE POINT HE MADE.
Your video didn't say anything, sorry but you didn't bother to actually say a single thing about my argument.
This is hilarious. Notice that my video responds to EVERY SINGLE POINT HE MAKES and he simply dismisses those responses with baseless assertions that they are 'meaningless' and 'don't say anything about the POE,' yet provides NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER to support those stupid assertions. Honestly, who do you think you are fooling? Don't come at me with these ridiculous baseless assertions in a disingenuous attempts to hide your inability to refute a single argument or point I've made with actual logic and evidence. It's that simple. Get your weight up, you're still in the amateurs. It is entirely ironic and hypocritical that Aaron would state my blog has lacks content, when his responses to me have no content WHATSOEVER. Nothing but baseless assertions and thinking my rebuttal to a SPECIFIC argument is a rebuttal to every single POE argument. Not only that be he COMPLETELY IGNORES the greater portion of my post, concentrating on only one part. The irony and hypocrisy of Aarons 'content lacking' statement is hilarious.
2 comments:
Ok, well. Theo, lets try this this way. What specific points did my original video make?
AND
What were your specific rebuttals to them?
Be clear and specific about this, because if you did respond to my points, you didn't do it in a way that was clear or obvious. From my perspective I didn't see you apprehending anything I said in my original video.
Did you watch the other response videos that were made to me? Do you really think you did a better job then them?
No seriously, you need to answer this. Because I am pretty sure you couldn't sum up the main points of my argument. If you really think you can, then you need to do it to demonstrate it, otherwise I cannot believe you actually attempted to understand it.
Shouldn't take more then 3 or so sentences, so I am not asking much.
Post a Comment